|This transcript appears in the October 9, 2015 issue of Executive Intelligence Review.
IBREAKTHROUGH IN CHINA
Zepp-LaRouche Presents EIR’s
This would be done with a system of high-speed rail lines that would help bring the land-locked and newly independent nations of Central Asia, and vast underpopulated and underdeveloped regions of Asiatic Russia, into the mainstream of international commerce and trade, thereby creating a land corridor for trade and economic development between Europe and Asia. The LaRouches dubbed this "The Eurasian Landbridge."
Discussions with representatives of the Chinese government in the early 1990s led to a conference in Beijing organized under the auspices of the ChineseMinistry of Science and Technology in 1996, Mrs. LaRouche explained. This conference with leading experts from China and 34 other Eurasian countries, included an address by Mrs. LaRouche devoted to theimplementation of this project. The Asian financial crisis of 1997 and the ruble crisis of 1998 prevented thefurther movement of this project. And it was only in September 2013 that Chinese President Xi Jinping revived the notion in his famous speech at Nazarbayev University in Kazakhstan, calling for the creation of a Silk Road Economic Belt to unite Europe and Asia.
View full size
The concept of the New Silk Road points in the direction of a new paradigm of mankind, Zepp-LaRouche told her audience, and away from the "geopolitics" which caused two world wars in the last century, and calls for replacing it with the idea of the common aims of mankind, which is reflected in Xi Jinping’s "win-win policy." While the "One Belt, One Road" has become the going term for the Chinese project, Mrs. LaRouche underlined the importance of the Silk Road precedent. "We should keep the term the New Silk Road," she said, "as it clearly expresses this cultural vision of cooperation manifested by the ancient Silk Road."
She then went into the crisis in the Middle East and the massive flow of refugees into Europe from the war-torn areas created by U.S. policy under Bush and Obama. There is a very recent recognition by many European nations, that there must be a change in policy and the root causes of the refugee crisis must be adressed, she said. It is not enough to fight the Islamic extremists militarily; there must also be a real economic reconstruction of the entire region, which isnow completely destroyed by war, to create a future for the young people now being attracted to violent jihad.
"We can extend the Silk Road to the Middle East," she said, "creating centers of development. We can make the deserts bloom and create new cities. The New Silk Road can become a peace order for the Twenty-first Century," she said. "If successful, it will create a new age of civilization, and if it fails, we will enter a new dark age."
EIR’s Washington Bureau Chief Bill Jones then outlined the tremendous possibilities opened for the world, including the United States, with the implementation of the Silk Road project. He noted how Lyndon LaRouche, in 1975, proposed the creation of an International Development Bank for financing the development of the Third World, and how the Foreign Minister of Guyana Fred Wills, had, in collaboration with LaRouche, issued at the UN General Assembly in 1976 a call for a New World Economic Order and a debt moratorium for the developing nations.
"But there would be no new world economic order nor any debt moratorium," Jones said. And the world then entered into a new phase of inflationary expansion of the world financial system which now encompasses over two quadrillion dollars of accumulatedand unpayabledebt. "President Xi’s project of a land and maritime Silk Road Initiative offers now the possibility of reversing that dangerous trajectory," Jones said. "The world stands in amazement over China’s development in the last few decades," Jones said, "and now China is offering a similar development for the rest of the world."
Jones also noted that, while the U.S. Administration has been less than enthusiastic about the project, there was a growing understanding in the United States, particularly at the state and local levels, which are greatly suffering the effects of the financial crisis, as well as among industrial layers, that what China is doingand is offering the worldrepresents a ray of hope in an otherwise disastrous economic situation.
These two presentations were followed by comments from eight leading Chinese scholars, who had read the report. Their reaction to the report was absolutely electric. Professor Bao Shixiu, formerly a Professor of Military Strategy at the PLA Academy of Military Sciences, said that bringing together the countries of the region around the New Silk Road initiative in a process of regional development was the task of the day. "It is also related to the notion of good governance," Professor Bao said, "and everyone has good feelings about this concept. We will thereby create a good neighborhood and begin to build a European common destiny." This was also the idea behind the notion of the Eurasian Landbridge put forward by the Schiller Institute in the 1990s, he said.
Ding Yifan, the former deputy director of the World Development Institute of the Development Research Center of the State Council of the PRC, underlined the importance of the economic concepts of Lyndon LaRouche, lying at the basis of the report. "I have known the Schiller Institute for a long time," he said, "and I have learned much from them. They have very specific ideas about the world economy. The concept underlying LaRouche’s view of the economy is that of the physical economy. LaRouche used the term negentropy to characterize the underlying laws of a healthy functioning economy," Ding Yifan said.
"Helga Zepp-LaRouche put forward the concept of the Eurasian Landbridge as a war avoidance concept," Ding added. "The new concept of the Belt and Road has received great attention from the whole world. . . . We cannot allow capital to control everything. Instead, we must control capital."
Shi Ze from the China Institute of International Studies explained how the problem in the world today is caused by geopolitical thinking. "Geopolitics has led to the dangerous situation we have today. The aim of the report is to develop a concept to replace geopolitics. And I found such a concept in this book," Shi said. "On the other hand, is the economic aspect of the report, which places the stress on creating infrastructure. We have to look at the infrastructure needs of the other countries," he said. "I am confident about the development of the Landbridge and I believe Mrs. LaRouche has made great progress in her idea."
Tao Qingmei of the Beijing Long Way Foundation noted that the report also mooted the question of a new order and a new relationship between nations. "This book reflects the views of U.S. experts and I really respect them. We should rethink the world on the basis of the new relationship between nations."
Wang Xiangsui, the director for the Center for Strategic Studies at Beijing University of Aeronautics and Astronautics, called the report "a road to the future." "Today we have to proceed from a regional perspective, one which involves economics, politics, and culture. China is learning from other countries. And this book is very important in that respect," he said.
Zhang Jianping, the Director of the Department of International Economic Cooperation at the National Development and Reform Commission, underlined the collaborative nature of the Silk Road Initiative and its openness to all countries. While noting scepticism from the U.S. side about the Silk Road project, he saw a certain shift in policy with regard to the U.S. view of the AIIB (Asian Infrastructure Investment Bank). Europe, on the other hand, was becoming absolutely enthusiastic about the project. Zhang felt that theEIR report, which he also noted was the result of 20 years’ labor, was an important element in promoting the idea of the New Silk Road in the United States.
Zhao Changhui from the China Export-Import Bank praised Progress Publishing for bringing out this report. He called the Silk Road project a thousand-year initiative. "When reading the report we have to ask ourselves how we can make a difference. It leads us to reflect on our own obligations." He said that scholars must develop a long-term vision, as it was reflected in the report.
Liu Ying, the Director of the Department of Cooperative Research at Chongyang Institute, noted that the report was written from a global perspective, but from a modern global perspective, including from a space perspective. "This report is about predicting the future rather than just explaining the past," Liu Ying said.
All the participants received a copy of the Chinese report. The Chongyang Institute had purchased 1,000 copies which they will distribute free of charge to a wide section of the Chinese political and intellectual circles. There was a considerable amount of coverage of the press conference in the economic press stressing the fact that this was the first analysis by "American scholars" of the Chinese project. There was also widespread recognition in the media reports of the role of Mrs. LaRouche and the Schiller Institute as a key initiator of this project in the early 1990s.
The high-level participation in the event by eight Chinese scholars, and the sponsorship by the prestigious Chongyang Institute for Financial Studies, underlined the fact that theEIR report has now become an authoritative source for Chinese scholars in pursuing the "One Belt, One Road" project. The economic concepts championed by Lyndon LaRouche over the period of 50-plus years have now become a staple for the intellectual layers in this, the most populous country in the world.
View full size